"Inhibitor" is the term used to refer to alloantibodies to factor (F) VIII or FIX that may develop in patients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) following exposure to the deficient coagulation factor (FVIII or FIX), which are recognised by the immune system as ‘non-self’. Sources may include plasma, cryoprecipitate and plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII/FIX concentrates. Inhibitors to FVIII and FIX are binding immunoglobulins (Ig), usually IgG, which may partially or completely neutralise the clotting activity of factor concentrates and render standard replacement therapy partially or completely ineffective.1 The immunological mechanisms regulating inhibitor development have not been fully elucidated.
Inhibitors develop in 20–30% of patients with severe HA and 5–10% of patients with mild or moderate HA.1 However, the reported prevalence of inhibitors differs from the incidence.2 This is most likely related to the occurrence of transient inhibitors or successful eradication using immune tolerance induction therapy.2 There is a lower risk of inhibitors in patients with HB (1–5%)1 than for HA, however there is a higher risk of anaphylactic reactions for patients with HB at the time of inhibitor development.3,4
Patients with a severe FVIII or FIX deficiency (FVIII or FIX levels <0.01 IU/mL) are most likely to develop an inhibitor due to previous non-exposure to the endogenous protein.3 Other potential risk factors for inhibitor development have also been identified.5 Patient-related risk factors include severity of haemophilia, family history of inhibitor development, presence of immune-response gene polymorphisms, specific F8 or F9 gene mutations and ethnicity.5 The risk of inhibitor development is significantly higher for siblings and in families with a previous history of inhibitors.6 Gene mutation studies have identified large deletions, missense, nonsense, frameshift and splice mutations in F8 and F9 that are associated with the development of inhibitors.7,8 Patients of Hispanic or African descent are more likely to develop inhibitors, possibly due to the presence of immune haplotypes in this population that differ from the haplotypes corresponding to proteins currently included in recombinant FVIII products.9,10
Treatment-related risk factors that have been described include the number of exposure days (EDs), the intensity of treatment, age at first exposure, type of therapeutic agent used (i.e., plasma-derived or recombinant), the current infection or inflammatory state of the patient and simultaneous vaccination administration with factor replacement therapy.5 The potential influence of the type of therapeutic product (recombinant vs plasma-derived ± von Willebrand factor), constitutes an ongoing debate issue, with non-conclusive results currently available11. Many inhibitors develop after 9–12 EDs and often within 50 EDs, and therefore frequent testing is recommended during those time periods.1,12
The presence of inhibitors should be suspected when a patient fails to respond to FVIII or FIX replacement therapy. Thorough testing is then required to confirm the presence and type (low or high response) of inhibitors, followed by regular monitoring to confirm transience and increasing or decreasing titres.
In patients with HA or HB, the presence of an inhibitor significantly worsens the prognosis and complicates treatment, especially in patients with high-titre inhibitors.13 Patients with mild or moderate HA or HB can also develop inhibitors, which may result in a more severe phenotype as the residual endogenous activity is neutralised by the inhibitor.3 Patients with inhibitors do not appear to have a greater tendency to bleed than untreated patients with severe haemophilia, and a correlation between bleeding severity and the presence of inhibitors has not been reported; however, patients with an inhibitor are more difficult to treat, since traditional factor replacement therapy is partially or completely ineffective. The development of inhibitors therefore complicates treatment and a reliable control of bleeding episodes, in addition to preventing joint disease in these patients, is challenging.13
The development of bypassing agents and other non-replacement therapies have improved the treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors, facilitating the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes. In countries in which patients have access to prophylactic FVIII/FIX replacement therapy, patients with HA or HB with inhibitors have worse outcomes, with a higher burden of orthopaedic complications and a lower quality of life compared to patients without inhibitors.14
HQMMA/NNG/0517/0165